Here’s what the report shows:
- The range was 3%: For all segments, the average for February was the lowest (5.9%), although a few sectors reported consistent numbers that month, and the average for June was the highest (8.9%).
- Surprisingly, even with Giving Tuesday, November’s average remained level at 7.9%. The highest individual November giving average was 9.2%, in the Arts and Culture sector.
- Human Services saw a spike in August through October, coinciding with the start of a new school year, with September’s rate being double to their December rates.
The summary? Most months for most sectors saw single digit giving distribution all year round, except for December, and few had more than one month of consistent increase or decrease in a row.
What Does This Mean?
Given the variety of org types represented, this level of consistency reflects on givers, not on seasonality or campaigns. We see that:
- Expectations don’t always play out like we’d think. For example, you might have a hunch that the lowest month of giving would be January, not February, considering not only the spike in charitable giving in December, but also consumers’ additional spending and traveling at that time.
- The so-called “summer slump” may be specific to certain organizations and not necessarily to givers.
While individual sectors and certainly specific nonprofits will often see more fluctuation from month to month, givers themselves are fairly consistent.
If overall charitable giving remains relatively steady throughout the first 11 months of the year, can nonprofits do anything to increase generosity? Can they create additional spikes, such as the ones seen at year-end? And if so, how?
Using Donation Distribution Data to Determine Your Seasonality
We’ve learned from multiple studies that donors want to be generous, but they often need a catalyst. Giving Tuesday, December holidays, and year-end tax advantages are the catalysts responsible for the traditional year-end spike. It’s a triple whammy that affects many people worldwide. It would be hard to duplicate a spike of that magnitude!
But that doesn’t mean there’s no hope for creating smaller spikes and leveling out dips.
Do your nonprofit’s recipients’ needs naturally align with seasonal events and activities? Or is your recipients’ need consistent year-round, with no specific peak times naturally occurring? Either way, it’s time to arm yourself with your own donation distribution data:
- When are your peak and lowest times of giving?
- What’s going on in the world at large during those months?
- What annual events could be a natural fit to align a new seasonal “dip” campaign with? Examples could include:
- Actual seasons
- Any specific time of year that creates a particular challenge to your recipients
- National events
- State Giving Days
Endless campaigning for general needs usually doesn’t serve as a catalyst for spiking generosity. You’ve got to create urgency with a deadline, and craft a tie-in between your recipients’ needs (in the form of a story) and your new fundraising “season.”
Allow yourself a three-month fundraising cycle to build up your marketing to a specific deadline, such as a matching donation offer. If you’re planning a physical event, you’ll want to allow 6-12 months to prepare.
Use Your “Off” Season to Plan Something New
Creating your own unique seasonality in your fundraising will make your campaigns more compelling and put you in front of your audience at a time that may trigger more generosity. Give the new season a little while to become a recognized part of your culture that donors expect to participate in year after year.
Best of all, if it’s YOUR season, it won’t be as apt to get lost in the noise of every other nonprofit’s big fundraising season.